The Magazine Medic
An industry expert offers a critique of Harperâ€™s Magazine.
THE PATIENT: Harperâ€™s Magazine
AGE: 161 years
PROGNOSIS: Downward spiral
We hate to see a patient hobble into our examination looking exhausted even before routine pleasantries have been exchanged. Sadder still when that patient, though aged, was once so vibrant and exalted.Â But that is the predicament of Harperâ€™s Magazine, which now appears to be in failing health.
There was a time when Harperâ€™s was a VIP (Very Important Periodical), a historically significant magazine that showcased some of the most important thinkers of the day. It still publishes some fine work, to be sure, but the competition among high-culture titles is fierce, and Harperâ€™s has not kept up.
Harperâ€™s and longtime rival The Atlantic once ran neck-and-neck. Now, the former (203,000 total circ) seems to be gasping while the latter (482,000 total circ)â€”with a recent infusion of cash and magazine-making talentâ€”has surged, winning readers, advertisers and trophies.
Harperâ€™s simply does not deliver enoughâ€”not enough top-notch journalism, photography, illustrations, not enough â€śahhhs.â€ť (And what does it say about a magazine when its full-page ads are the most splendid-looking pages in the issue?)
Normally, we prescribe delicate measures, but with Harperâ€™s we have no alternative but to suggest scalpels, instruments for implantation and a stomach for the kind of radical surgery from which, honestly, the book might not recover. Â
What We PrescribeÂ Â
â€˘ Harperâ€™s is currently less a place to present brilliant new pieces than a monthly repository of ephemera and somewhat marginal or quirky writings lifted from other sources. Thatâ€™s what the Web and its bookmarking sites are for. So, first of all, the magazineâ€™s editors should assign lots more original work, front to back. Push for whatâ€™s provocative or counter-intuitive. Forget about book reviews; everyone publishes those.
â€˘ Rethink the presentation of â€śHarperâ€™s Index,â€ť which is the signature front-of-book department. A collection of ironic facts and figures, running as a full page of completely un-arted text? In 2011? You have got to be kidding.
â€˘ Introduce an editorâ€™s letter (with a picture), something to personalize the connection.
â€˘ Letâ€™s overhaul the tired design, add new departments, rethink cover concepts, focus on the magazineâ€™s voiceâ€”actually, do anything that suggests the editors understand that a magazineâ€”no matter its venerable historyâ€”needs to constantly recalibrate to fit the times.
Unless Harperâ€™s goes ahead with a serious, life-saving procedure to rescue it from deteriorating into total irrelevance, thereâ€™s not much hope.
A well-known reporter, writer, and editorâ€”at Time Inc., Primedia, and other American Â publishing companiesâ€”Cable Neuhaus has frequently been called on to help create, repair, and run consumer and trade titles of various kinds.