ADVERTISEMENT



Trying to Make Sense of Magazine Closings

MPA: Economics, not readers, are behind it all.


Bill Mickey By Bill Mickey
08/19/2009 -08:16 AM






The MPA wants to make a few things clear about the unfortunate string of magazine closures we've been experiencing.

It's the economy, stupid. That's not what they said, exactly, but they'd like to remind everyone that the readers are still there—it's the advertisers that are jumping ship. A data sheet posted on MPA's site in early August attempts to point out that consumer interest, via circ levels, is maintaining while advertising declines correspond with shutdowns.

Also, last year wasn't all that bad compared to other years. In fact, we didn't even come close to 2000-2001 levels.

The MPA cites closure metrics from Ulrich's Periodicals Directory. Apparently, there were 54 magazines closed in 2008, which is 11 less than 2007 and, interestingly, 50 less than 2006, which was the peak for mag closings after 2001.

None of this makes recent numbers any more tolerable, really. Closings and the subsequent job loss in any situation are horrible. But the MPA is attempting to take a big-picture view and attach the numbers to the economy rather than a specific loss of consumer interest, which would be really bad.

PIB revenue declines, for example, occurred only in recession years. ABC average circ dropped during these same periods, but by far lower percentages. Therefore, concludes MPA, advertising is the "dominant factor in magazine closings."

Yet looking at the Ulrich numbers only makes things more confusing. Yes, 2000 and 2001 saw unprecedented closure rates—125 and 166, respectively—but that recession period was an anomaly, if anything. The years between the indicated 1991 to 1992 and 2008 recession years experienced much higher closure rates, and are comparatively high even to 2000 and 2001 standards.

In other words, Ulrich's numbers don't necessarily jibe with the idea that closures are tied to a recession—there are lots of closings every year. As I mentioned earlier, 2006, not a recession year, had 104 magazine closings—twice as many as last year.

Plus, it would make a lot more sense to dig deeper and examine the kinds of magazines that close. Say, big mass-market mags versus smaller niche enthusiast titles.





Bill Mickey By Bill Mickey --

Post Comment / Discuss This Blog - Info/Rules

Looking at the wrong thing the wrong way
Submitted by ZenRed on Fri, 08/21/2009 - 17:30.

As usual this is partial data, not real information. The data that needs to be examined is the NET increase or decrease in the number of magazines or better the aggregate number of magazine advertising pages delivered. (advertising pages times circulation times issues per year) After all which is greater, a regional Magazine closing or a Major National cutting size, issues and circulation?
Come on
Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 08/21/2009 - 22:16.

I have been in this business 30 years, and no matter how you shake it, this is the worst time period ever. There have always been closings, but in good times there were many more titles to take the place of the closed ones. Not true now. There are new titles, but the good ones are far and few between.

RECENTLY in M and A and Finance dots icon

MOST READ on FOLIOdots icon

FOLIO: Alerts & Newslettersdots icon

Sign up for our news alerts, special offers & feature updates:



FOLIO: Alerts
Breaking news & industry updates

FOLIO: Publishing Technology
The Latest on Trends, Issues & Products (2x Monthly)

FOLIO: Special Promos
Special offers & announcements from Partners, Sponsors & Red 7 Media

FOLIO: Update
Webinar, content & service feature updates



CONNECT WITH FOLIO: NOW
   


CAREER CENTER dots icon

Latest Featured Jobs


Join mediaPRO Today: Click Here


Media Pros Connect on the new professional and social network for the Magazine, eMedia & Publishing Industry today.