ADVERTISEMENT



Survey: Trade Publishers Expect to Reduce Personnel Costs By 15 Percent

ABM CEO: ‘This is the worst thing we’ve gone through since the 1930s.'


By Jason Fell
07/23/2009

It’s no secret that the failing economy has negatively impacted all sectors of the magazine business this year, particularly b-to-b publishing. So much so that publishers are making financial adjustments, especially in regard to personnel, in order to survive.

According to a recent American Business Media survey, conducted online by research firm Towers Perrin, 70 percent of member respondents indicated that they have reduced workforces this year. More than 80 percent of respondents said their company has frozen or plan to freeze salary increases for all employees, according to survey results. One third of respondents said they have reduced employee salaries while 22 percent of those said the reductions are temporary.

Results indicated that publishers who participated in the survey expect financial adjustments to reduce personnel costs by up to 15 percent this year.

“This is probably the worst thing we’ve gone through since the 1930s,” ABM president and CEO Gordon Hughes told FOLIO:. “Did we find out much we didn’t already know? Not really. But, this is a confirmation for our members to say that while what they’re doing is difficult, it’s what they need to do now to stay in business, and is what their peers are doing, too.”

Survey results also showed that 78 percent of respondents have or are cutting T&E spending. Seventy-three percent said they have frozen or reduced new hires.

Meanwhile, roughly 25 percent of respondents reduced the number of employees receiving annual incentives. Sixteen percent reduced the number of employees receiving stock- or cash-based long-term incentives.

Hughes said approximately 20 percent of the group’s 150 members participated in the survey. The entire report is available only to members who participated in the survey, ABM said.




Post Comment / Discuss This Story - Info/Rules

Thank You Nostradamus
Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 07/23/2009 - 13:54.

Now tell us something we don't know.
C Suite Wake Up! DO NOT Cut In The Wrong Area : SALES
Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 07/23/2009 - 13:59.

This defies everything a publisher is supposed to do in a bad economy. Pay your best sales people top dollar and keep them so there is not mass mutiny in the turn around. Right now, sales are gods and if people in publishing dont have a $$ sign on their heads, get rid of em. Not needed, Sorry, but that is the reality. Too many good sales people are going to abandon companies when things get better and most sales people are not as replaceable as The C suite realizes. In fact, CEOs are going to be stuck w a bunch of products no one can sell in better days.
cuts in the wrong area
Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 07/23/2009 - 14:07.

I'm going to guess that the previous commenter is in sales. The argument is really true for ANY job function, though.
Suffered enough already!
Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 07/23/2009 - 15:07.

Okay, fine ... pay your sales reps top dollar so they'll stay. But if you don't have quality editorial, those poor sales people will have nothing to sell.
Relevance?
Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 07/23/2009 - 15:11.

Not that I am denying things are tough in our industry but how relevant is this survey? 20% of 150 members is only 30 people. It makes a good headline but it lacks a complete industry voice.
Genius
Submitted by Sammy Zoso on Thu, 07/23/2009 - 17:52.

That's right. Keep all sales people, in fact hire more. It's all about sales anyway.Run more product releases, in fact run all product releases. Forget publishing quality content. So passe. Run editorial promoting products and companies. With some exception that's what the industry became anyway, so who cares?
relevance
Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 07/23/2009 - 19:51.

you have no idea about survey responses, eh? or e-mail click through? 20% is significant. breaking news? no. relevant news? yes.
response: cuts in wrong area
Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 07/24/2009 - 07:22.

Isnt everyone in publishing in sales? Also, I dont have sales title, just an interest in protecting the sales people who are not replaceable and the lifeline to the business. Belive me, I get the cliche "everyone is expendable", but C Suiters (including me) need to build sales oriented companies, and everyone needs to know the customer (audience & advertisers) is the only thing that matters. My sense is most C/Execs dont get it; look at all the sales jobs in publishing; actually quite plentiful.
response: Genius
Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 07/24/2009 - 07:35.

No question edit/content is mission critical and editors whether they think so or not, are an extension of sales. In B2B especially, they need to be engaged with the market and build a relationship and bring vendor info to our audience customers. Listen, we're all in this together and my respect for all Publishing Pros is huge. MY Point simply is to not dismiss the importance of a stable effective sales force. Take care of these people, and the business will take care of itself and the fullfilment, prodcution, edit, creative, web, and even the C/execs might just be able to keep their jobs and grow the business. Protect sales, protect the business. With respect......-A Non-Sales By Title B2B Exec
re: nostradamus
Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 07/24/2009 - 07:42.

Arent these posts meant to be constructive? So, instead of writing dirsreptful notes that your peers will read, add value by making comments that may help someone. We're all in this together and part of a great cummunity. so, instead of the snide posts, support the community in more constructive ways. My original posts bc the co I work for, could care less about sales abd treats them badly. So I'm wondering if that is the case in other orgs and the community agrees.
Sales in B2B has fundamentally changed years ago forever
Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 07/24/2009 - 08:42.

The ongoing change in B2B pub sales of replacing well skilled, experienced (and from a publisher perspective, expensive) talent with independent contractors or low payed newbies is here to stay. The smart sales people have already fled to online sales opportunities where the money is better and the stress less than trying to sell low demand content in low demand vehicles (print). Let us not forget that the entire industry would be in a much better place IF publishers had not gotten themselves into this mess by feeding on the greed of the early 2000's and taking on MASSIVE debt to fuel ill timed acquisitions of vapor ware online entities. Penton, Reed, Nielsen/VNU, McGraw Hill, Cygnus, etc are all suffocating under packs of VC vultures pecking away at their carcases. Until publishers grasp that porting their print content to the web is not an online strategy, this tune will continue to be played. I think a case can still be made for a biweekly with in-depth content as weeklies are too slow to arrive in respect to online delivery and monthlies take too long to get out the door. However, biweeklies take more cash to produce and that is in very short supply in publishing these days.
Two headlines
Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 07/24/2009 - 12:49.

Two headlines back-to-back: "Private Equity Groups Show Interest in Acquiring BusinessWeek" "Trade Publishers Expect to Reduce Personnel Costs By 15 Percent" Headline coming soon: "BusinessWeek lays off . . ."
You can only cut so much before you hit bone
Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 07/28/2009 - 15:43.

You know there's an adage that I've held to throughout my paltry 18-year career in B2B publishing: at the end of the day, a company -- no matter how large -- is just five people, and those five people are motivated purely by self interest. I've also noticed that these five people, no matter what the company, have been in continual cut mode since I started. Well know these five people have no real editorial product and no sales staff to rent space. I think it's high time these five clowns stop stripping away their business assets (i.e., the talented, hard-working individuals who actually make things happen for their business), and start cutting their compensation. Time for the execs to share the real pain -- that is, if they want to survive.



RECENTLY in B2B dots icon
MOST READ on FOLIO: dots icon

FOLIO: Alerts & Newsletters dots icon

Sign up for our news alerts, special offers & feature updates:






CONNECT WITH FOLIO: NOW
   


Find What You Need dots icon

Folio: Marletplace

Seach top vendors, suppliers, service providers & more

Browse & Search the Full Directory Now



CAREER CENTER dots icon

Latest Featured Jobs