ADVERTISEMENT



Preparing for Change 25 Years Too Late?

Paid content model is easy to implement, but hard to sell when ads are involved.


Vanessa Voltolina By Vanessa Voltolina
05/21/2009 -14:11 PM






NEW YORK—At the Bryant Park Hotel last night, a discussion sponsored by Bluewolf, a technology consulting company (with the generic sounding title “Future of Media: Preparing for Change”) kicked off with a video clip from 1981 about the San Francisco Examiner’s first experiments putting print content online.

It’s a bit disconcerting that a few of the same major issues that media companies were grappling with in 1981—like paid content models and the Web putting print employees out of jobs—are plaguing the industry today.

During a Q&A session—with media executives from Google to the Buffalo News weighing in—keynoter Clay Shirkey, technologist, professor of interactive telecommunications at New York University and “the provocative voice of all things Internet,” said this: “Media companies keep talking about paid content, and as a result are really just restating the problem.”

Shirky believes that the next step in the publishing model is paid content through online subscriptions, something which, he says, has been “unexplored.” He cited magazines like Cook’s Illustrated and Consumer Reports as examples of this success. “The model is easy enough that anyone can implement it by next Thursday…but in order to get readers to pay for online subscriptions, you have to offer something on their behalf, like no advertising.”





Vanessa Voltolina By Vanessa Voltolina --

Post Comment / Discuss This Blog - Info/Rules

Not sure how it's "unexplored"
Submitted by Tuesday on Fri, 05/22/2009 - 12:22.

Asking people to pay for online content may not have been explored by many magazines, but the media outlets that have tried it have learned that few people are wiling to pay for online content. The lure of free sites covering the same beat is just too irresistible. Therefore, only very specific, niche magazines will find online subscribers. Most magazines today--women's or men's service, news, fashion, general shelter--don't qualify. I can see a book like Vogue succeeding with an online subscription because their brand has definitive value, but at a greatly reduced circ. They would lose the online readers who are just casually interested in fashion and be left with a much smaller group of hardcore devotees. Which won't necessarily be bad. The Internet means the end of mass scalability. Niche is the rule. What that will also mean for the media industry is lower salaries, greatly reduced perks, and possibly even the end of offices in very expensive New York City.
are you providing such compelling and xclusive content?
Submitted by RAJENDRA TIWARI on Sat, 05/23/2009 - 00:44.

Murdoch is exploring the model. basic q is that whether we provide such compelling exclusive content which could tempt viewers even to buy it. mind it such content involves increasingly high cost.

RECENTLY in emedia and Technology dots icon

MOST READ on FOLIOdots icon

FOLIO: Alerts & Newslettersdots icon

Sign up for our news alerts, special offers & feature updates:



FOLIO: Alerts
Breaking news & industry updates

FOLIO: Publishing Technology
The Latest on Trends, Issues & Products (2x Monthly)

FOLIO: Special Promos
Special offers & announcements from Partners, Sponsors & Red 7 Media

FOLIO: Update
Webinar, content & service feature updates



CAREER CENTER dots icon

Latest Featured Jobs