ADVERTISEMENT



Entrepreneur Files Motion to Dismiss Lawsuit

Publisher says it 'owes its readers no duty to ensure accuracy.'


By Dylan Stableford
05/22/2009

Entrepreneur has filed a motion to dismiss a $178 million lawsuit brought against it by a group of investors who allege the magazine misled them about a company featured on its “Hot 100” list.

The founder of that company, Agape World, was later arrested and charged with a $370 million mail fraud—part of an alleged Ponzi scheme.

Earlier this month, the group filed suit in a New York court, claiming Entrepreneur “deliberately, willfully and recklessly failed to exercise due diligence in publishing information” about Agape, which was featured in Entrepreneur’s May 2008 issue. The group said it decided to invest in Agape based on the information published by Entrepreneur.

In documents filed in U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of New York on Thursday, Entrepreneur, citing rulings in similar court cases, said it is “under no duty to provide information with care to its readers.” Click here for a PDF of the court documents.

“New York law establishes … that a publisher is under no duty of care to its readers to ensure the accuracy of published information,” the motion reads, “unless it constitutes a breach of contract, obligation, or trust, or amounts to deceit, libel or slander.”

“A publisher, even those who maintain a paid subscription service, such as Entrepreneur, owes its readers no duty to ensure the accuracy of its publications, and thus, cannot incur liability for an allegedly inaccurate statement.”

The “Hot 100” list, Entrepreneur said, was “offered as informative material to an audience of general readers” and does not “draw any conclusions nor makes any recommendations to its readers, as to the financial suitability of an investment in any of the listed companies.”

RELATED LINKS




Post Comment / Discuss This Story - Info/Rules

So, if the publisher is
Submitted by Anonymous on Mon, 05/25/2009 - 08:12.

So, if the publisher is under no obligation to ensure that the content of the magazine is in any way trustworthy advice, why read it?
Entreprenuer lawsuit
Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 05/28/2009 - 09:36.

This lawsuit should be thrown out. The precedence that this would set if validated would throw trade journals into mass hysteria. I run many products and articles on product technology in my magazine. It is ridiculous to require due diligence be exercised for every product and every technological assertion. It would be cost prohibitive. That's why we all run "disclaimers." I hope Entreprenuer had such a statement.
Entrepreneur guilty of gross negligence?
Submitted by Scott Smith on Thu, 05/28/2009 - 21:41.

According to Entrepreneur, its lists are directly responsible for helping them sell millions of mag$ and ad$. So (credibly) explain why they shouldn't be held at least partially responsible for the accuracy of their own lists, especially when they're making millions of add'l dollars because of their lists? And I believe this lawsuit accuses Emag of 'gross negligence.' So unless this group can prove such a serious allegation, Emag shouldn't have much to worry about, should they?…and neither should publishers who are not guilty of gross negligence. However, if it turns out the Emag is guilty of gross negligence, shouldn't other publishers want Emag to be punished for recklessly injuring its readers and tarnishing the reputation of all publishers???



RECENTLY in M and A and Finance dots icon
MOST READ on FOLIO: dots icon

FOLIO: Alerts & Newsletters dots icon

Sign up for our news alerts, special offers & feature updates:






CONNECT WITH FOLIO: NOW
   


Find What You Need dots icon

Folio: Marletplace

Seach top vendors, suppliers, service providers & more

Browse & Search the Full Directory Now


FOLIO: mediaPRO dots icon

CAREER CENTER dots icon

Latest Featured Jobs