ADVERTISEMENT



Condé Nast Strikes Video Deal with Hulu

Publisher reaches ad share agreement as push for paid content grows.


By Matt Kinsman
03/12/2009

As the drumbeat for magazine publishers to start charging for online content grows louder, Condé Nast announced today a new content distribution relationship with Hulu.com, the online video hub that offers TV shows, movies and video clips for free.

Under the terms of the agreement Condé Nast Digital will distribute video content from sites such as Style.com, epicurious.com, Wired.com and Vogue.TV on Hulu and through partners such as AOL, MSN, MySpace and Yahoo!. Additional Hulu channels will serve other Condé Nast brands in the future, the companies said.

Condé Nast has existing distribution relationships with YouTube, Adobe Media Player, Sony Bravia Internet Video and Verizon V-Cast.

The agreement with Hulu also includes an ad sales revenue share.  

Drumbeat for a Paid Model

While publishers’ first attempts at charging for content online (particularly micropayments) largely failed, there has been an increasing interest in revisiting that model as it becomes apparent online ad spending isn’t immune to the downturn—and  advertisers still resist paying premiums for digital campaigns.  

Earlier this month Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes proposed “TV Everywhere,” an initiative with many major media players that would both let consumers view video on any platform they wanted, for a price.

Time Inc. CEO Ann Moore told London’s Telegraph newspaper that the company needs to reconsider charging for content, including making Time.com and People.com subscription-only. "I think it is time for Time Inc to sit down and seriously think, what is the model? We are going to have to figure out a way to have paid content in the future," she said. "Who started this [rumor] that all information should be free and why didn't we challenge this when it first came out? I say this in college classrooms and they start to throw their shoes at me. I say, 'Kids, your food is not free and your cars are not free, your clothes are not free. Good information costs money. Someone has to pay for the Baghdad bureau'."

Even smaller publishers and standalone bloggers are getting into the act with a startup service called Kachingle that proposes users pay a voluntary fee to access news and blog content on the Web and support the sites they most often look to for content.

“The margins are smaller today and they may always be smaller,” Condé Nast Digital president Sarah Chubb told FOLIO: recently. “The costs to produce a really great Web site are high, particularly the people costs. The cost of sale is often relatively high. One the magazine side—you book a schedule and make sure they have good placement and the pages are beautiful and everybody calls it a day. With online, it’s different.”

RELATED LINKS




Post Comment / Discuss This Story - Info/Rules

Fighting the future [present] will leave you in the past
Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 03/12/2009 - 13:11.

Those in the publishing industry are repeating themselves regarding paid online content. Of course college students are throwing their shoes at Ann Moore. The reality is, if your online content is going to cost me to access, I will simply go elsewhere. You may wish every reader was sending in $1 for each click, but that is not reality. If we continue to view online as a replica of print, we will continue to be disappointed. Online is not the same as print, it has its own limitations and possibilities. As an industry we need to capitalize on online possibilities with a different approach than we take for print media.
Make a choice
Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 03/12/2009 - 15:37.

I will pay for QUALITY, ORIGINAL, IN DEPTH content on the web, but that doesn't include 99% of content on the web. I think you need to make a choice; free content with ads or paid content without. If you think I'm going to pay to access your site and then have to see a Ford pop-out ad as well, you are sorely mistaken.
Online and Print- the new partnership
Submitted by SML on Thu, 03/12/2009 - 17:23.

Here's the process- The reality is, that Print and Internet need to co-exist. Because so much content is free now- no one wants to pay for it. Why should I buy a magazine at the newsstand when I can go to the website? Therefore, the content on line should be just enough to draw in subscription sales and newsstand desire. In return, print should then be carrying inserts, that will then push readers to the web. For example, a variable data printed piece that is inserted into a magazine that has a generated personal website that looks like:http://bla bla-magazine/joe-advertiser/readers-name.com So that when the reader gets his/her issue of bla bla magazine and sees this insert with their name on it, sponsored by joe-advertiser; and reader goes there- the magazine is showing the power of their magazine to drive readers to the internet, and to the advertisers website- to make a purchase. The minute everyone realizes this is a dual channel environment and that publishers can NO LONGER rely on just print or just e-advertising, everything will turn around. You cannot publish a book without a partnership between art and edit. You can't print without ink on paper, and you can't mail without postage or the post office. Seriously- it's not an either or anymore; it's duplicity. If you can get an advertiser to buy in your book and online, and give your readers a reason to go online for the reason they want to be on-line, and read your print for the reason they want to read print, then it's a win-win for everyone. I believe in free content on-line- but, you should only get what you pay for. If you pay nothing; get a little. Buy the magazine get it all. Don't want the magazine? Buy a subscription on line. If you like the content, then isn't it worth paying for? Everyone pays for cable, right? Same content on channel 4, channel 7, cnbc, msnbc, etc. why should print and internet be any different? The bottom line is that on-line should not be a replica of print, and vice versa. They should in fact be partners.



RECENTLY in emedia and Technology dots icon
MOST READ on FOLIO: dots icon

FOLIO: Alerts & Newsletters dots icon

Sign up for our news alerts, special offers & feature updates:






CONNECT WITH FOLIO: NOW
   



Find What You Need dots icon

Folio: Marletplace

Seach top vendors, suppliers, service providers & more

Browse & Search the Full Directory Now



CAREER CENTER dots icon

Latest Featured Jobs