ADVERTISEMENT



UPDATE: Source Interlink, Anderson News to Shut Down Wholesale Ops

After threatening price hikes, wholesalers to exit magazine distribution biz.


By Tony Silber and Dylan Stableford and Jason Fell and Bill Mickey
02/03/2009

UPDATE: Anderson News Suspends ‘Normal Business Activity’

Two weeks after threatening publishers with separate 7-cents-per-copy price hikes, a pair of major magazine wholesalers, Anderson News and Source Interlink, have decided to cease operations, according to a source at Comag.

When contacted by FOLIO:, a Source Interlink spokesperson declined to comment “on rumors.” Anderson could not be reached for comment.

Last month, a week after Anderson News announced it would increase its price by 7 cents per copy, Source Interlink said it will be raising its own per-copy distribution rates by 7 cents.

Combined, the pair account for about 50 percent of the magazine market.

Both companies gave publishers the deadline of February 1 to comply with the price hike.

Publishers and distributors balked at the idea. Time Inc. and national distributor Curtis Circulation said its publisher clients will not comply with the Anderson's 7-cent price increase. Comag, however, extended its contracts with both Anderson and Source Interlink—without the price increase.

Now, all four national distributors have stopped shipping their magazines to Anderson and Source, including Comag.

What's Next?

Magazines with on-sale dates of the week of February 2 will still be distributed. Comag is asking clients to not ship magazines with on-sale dates after that week until further notice.

According to distribution sources, Hudson News and News Group—two other major magazine wholesalers—have been working behind the scenes to pick up the business left on the table by Anderson and Source. Most of the major retailers, the sources said, are negotiating contracts.

According to these sources, Hudson News will expand into Southern California and its East Coast operations into the mid-Atlantic. Newsgroup will expand into the southeast and Chicago.

Two hours ago, retailers signed over business from Anderson to Newsgroup, including Wal-Mart, according one source.

'It's Going to Be a Mess'

But most are not expecting a smooth transition. “It’s going to be a mess for a couple of weeks,” said one major consumer publisher.

“Fifty percent of the distribution market has just evaporated,” said John Loughlin, executive vice president and general manager at Hearst magazines.

“The thing I worry about is the law of unintended consequences,” he added. “You can debate who precipitated this, but I'm a believer in free-market competition.”

Loughlin said it is going to be “very difficult to smoothly transition that tonnage of magazines to the market using alternative methods.”

He added: “I guess I'm glad I'm not publishing weeklies."

According to another source: “This is going to hit some regional magazines 100 percent. It will put
many out of business, to the extent they rely on newsstand."

“Weeklies would be hit the hardest while others will have more time to come up with another plan," John Harrington, publisher of the New Single Copy newsletter, told FOLIO:. "There will be lost sales for some issues.”

There were some publishers who felt Anderson and Source would back down from their initial demands. It appears now they were not bluffing.

“The business has not been profitable and has not been for a very long time,” CEO Charlie Anderson said in a January conference call. “What we are trying to do is give some stability to the channel. Short of that, there will be an implosion in the business."

Check FOLIOmag.com throughout the day for updates to this story.

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This story has been corrected from an earlier version. In it, the above quote about regional magazines was incorrectly attributed to John Loughlin.]

RELATED LINKS




Post Comment / Discuss This Story - Info/Rules

There goes the mainline
Submitted by Rachel on Tue, 02/03/2009 - 16:11.

There goes the mainline
Anderson down
Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 02/03/2009 - 16:59.

It certain that costs and expenses have taken their toll on the support chain in almost every industry. I know that other dist co will take up the slack. I just wonder if they will bother to contact the personnel and offer them a position since they have experience, especially regionally where the the new company has not been operating.
Train Wreck
Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 02/03/2009 - 17:56.

This is going to distroy both the Wholesalers and Publisher (National Distributors).... OUCH!!!!
Rumors and Speculation
Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 02/03/2009 - 18:49.

Until either company makes an 'official' statement (Source Interlink is publicly owned, I believe Anderson News is privately owned), this is all merely heresy. Note that all 4 authors/contributors to this piece are with Red 7 Media - not with any of the involved parties. In addition, other wholesalers are in no shape financially to 'absorb' the costs of operating the areas noted in this article. Instead of watching the "Train Wreck" as noted above, maybe it would be best to watch what the publishers, distributors, wholesalers and retailers really say they are doing before calling "chicken little."
It's broke...someone needs to fix it
Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 02/03/2009 - 19:10.

If this changes nothing, trouble still waits the industry. Two of the largest wholesalers are nonprofitable so what makes anyone think the others are making a dime? Competitors even use the same field service force, so what really changes? What about competition in the marketplace? Does that disappear because there is only one game in town? Not a good situation by any means.
Future of Single Copy
Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 02/03/2009 - 19:32.

How can Hudson and News Group survive on the same economics that Anderson and Source couldn't? What's the future for Source-Interlink's magazines? How much damage and lost sales will this cost the publishers and retailers? What's next? How low can publishers sell subscriptions? Hello verified sales!
Time for change!!
Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 02/03/2009 - 22:00.

Source Interlink and Anderson News were already in the gutter!! Anderson owns more profitable divisions so that’s where they'll focus their efforts now. As for Source, Dist and pubs were in the gutter since the days of PRIMEDIA. The shareholders of Source purchased PRIMEDIA with hopes that they’d save the company however the purchase only made their situation worst. What a BIG mistake!! On the other hand, News Group and Hudson aren’t in the same financial shape as Source and Anderson. This leads me to believe that they’ll be just fine.
Flaws in the system finally take their toll
Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 02/03/2009 - 22:53.

This was bound to happen. This industry is by far the most dysfunctional business model around. Imagine multiple suppliers of the same product operating in the same geographic region....There is not one other industry that operates in this fashion. Why? Because it does not work. We are finally seeing the ramifications of letting the retailer dictate how to operate your business. It is time to take a stand. News Group and Hudson just gained a huge amount of leverage with retailers. Fewer options means that the supplier won't have to keep giving to retrain the business
It is broken....
Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 02/03/2009 - 23:36.

Surely Anderson and Source-Interlink must qualify for "bail-out" funding! Their problems stem from giving all of their profits to the retailers. How is that any different from handing out bad mortgages. And why aren't they going back to the retailers for concessions?
mutual suicide
Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 02/03/2009 - 23:43.

If Anderson and Interlink leave the market the remaining wholesalers do not have the infrastructure to pick up the slack, even if they could afford the loses. Time/Warner and Curtis are literialy committing suicide by only worrying about the short term. If this happens, it will not be long before we here or TW and Curtis announcing the end of their own operations. Regardless of who's to blame, the employees will be left out in the cold while the CEO/Owners just move on to greener fields.
This story is being widely discredited ...
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 02/04/2009 - 07:52.

FolioMag, please get your facts right... I have done some searching and this story may possibly land you in a lawsuit by causing issues to Source's stock with false reporting. Here are some more accurate reports: http://www.nypost.com/seven/02042009/business/no_people_at_wal_mart_1534... also we have http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/content_display/news/magazines-newspapers/e3... . The last link has Comag clearly stating that this was a rumor. Do you possibly think Comag has a reason to 'leak' this info to you? Or maybe it was someone else and you didn't fact check? Maybe it's to cause panic and stir the pot even further. Either way I am highly disappointed in this article considering all the speculation.
distributers
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 02/04/2009 - 09:54.

Just drop the magazines off at the stores and let the associates stock them.Did you ever see the amount of returns that go back weekly to the distibuters because they dont sell ,(SOMETIMES THOUSANDS)IN MY OPINION THAT IS A WASTE OF MONEY AND TIME.AND ON TOP OF THAT THEY ALWAYS OVERSHIP MAGAZINES.MAYBE THATS WHY HIGH RETURNS,SUPPLY AND DEMAND.. ALL THIS OF COURSE IS ONLY MY OPINION THANK YOU
Do you think Source can survive?
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 02/04/2009 - 10:22.

Source Interlink's stock today is selling at 10-cents a share! It was $12 a share before the Primedia acquisition. They've already dumped the CEO who did that deal. Last year Wal-Mart dropped all but a couple of the Primedia (now source Interlink Media) titles -- which was a major souce of newsstand revenue for Primedia -- and newsstand sell throughs for many of the titles are at or below 20%, or so we've been told. The ad market for cars is a disaster and that is the lion share of revenue for the company. Meanwhile, Source Interlink kept Primedia's publishing CEO but gave him the dis-incentive of cutting his compensation by two-thirds, allotting a few totally worthless stock options, and killed his bonus. Is there a life boat to save this sinking ship? Just asking.
Checked links from this story is being widely discredited
Submitted by Anonymouse on Wed, 02/04/2009 - 10:32.

I followed the links from the previous submitted post that sustained that this story was a rumor. Didn't find a thing to support that view. In fact, I did not find anything at all, which leads me to believe that post not be legitimate.
@Checked links from this story is being widely discredited
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 02/04/2009 - 10:51.

from the later article... "Source Interlink Cos. denied a news report that it is shutting down its magazine wholesaler business, while firing back at publishers that balked at wholesalers’ demands for higher fees." Odd that Source Interlink is in fact calling this story a false hood... That is discrediting this story... Thanks. Try again.
I work for both Anderson and News Group
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 02/04/2009 - 11:04.

Both these companys own another distribution company together named Prologix that handels most magazine deliveries. Prologix is up and running today and will be for the long haul. There is nore in the shadows than you know.
Shutdown part may not be correct.
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 02/04/2009 - 11:46.

People are still answering the phone and working at Anderson News' corporate office, so I'd recommend that Folio get some additional sources for this information. I think the headline may be in error.
Shutdown part may not be correct?
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 02/04/2009 - 12:23.

You expect a retraction from Folio? Never. C'mon..they want website traffic to go up. It doesn't matter that they scare thousands of people into thinking they are losing their jobs. Profit is far more important that journalistic integrity. Better go somewhere else if you are looking for truth.
If you're in this industry...
Submitted by Mike from Here on Wed, 02/04/2009 - 13:50.

...you should already be quite scared! If you're not, then you're not getting it.
still here..
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 02/04/2009 - 15:54.

I work at the Anderson Corporate offices. The parking lot is as full as usual. Still waiting for any official announcements regarding the 7cent surcharge. I've been checking back here all day to see if they have any knew news. I used to think Foliomag was legit, now I see they only contribute to the hysteria, not to the solutions.
interesting...
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 02/04/2009 - 16:43.

Things are getting interesting... Some things should be coming out into to the open REAL soon...
This is what I think...
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 02/04/2009 - 16:54.

I think Comag freaked out and retracted their comment
I still think Source and Anderson will shut down this year. Looking back, I wouldn't be surprised if Source Interlink Distribution was used as a bailout for Source Interlink Media (magazine division). As for Anderson, this division of Anderson is good as gone.
Speculation
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 02/04/2009 - 18:26.

I also work at the Corporate office of ANCO. Yes, we are still in business for the moment. Can't any of these media websites get it right? There is no way that I will believe that the turn down of Time was anything more than playground bully tactics. This has nothing to do with economics where they are concerned and everything to do with them trying to flex their muscles. Give me a break! If they can pay millions of dollars for stupid celebrity baby pics to plaster on their precious People magazine then they can surely fork over 7 cents per magazine distributed! The one major mistake that Time may have overlooked is an ace in the hole that ANCO holds. I think we may see this card played very soon. Keep your eyes peeled.....
hey TIME
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 02/04/2009 - 20:14.

Stick your People where the sun don't shine cos we are kickin butt and taking names. Folio, ugh, what were you thinking.Totally agree with paying millions for baby pix and then trying to burn the little people (no pun).
Take a good look at these comments.
Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 02/05/2009 - 12:36.

The comments here are loaded with spelling errors. If this is a sampling of magazine industry workers, it is amazing any of them are still in business. It appears distribution is not the only problem. In the current economic environment, every business should have a plan for replacement of any product or service provider.
Anco stimulus package
Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 02/05/2009 - 13:26.

When going into a retailer serviced by Anderson, I have always been amazed that they continually place the wrong products in the wrong locations. They have given the kitchen sink to the retailers and hit the publishers for programs that have not and will not work. (In fact, your lucky to have your product placed in the "program" area at all.) I've seen small retailers kicked out by Anco only to have their profits tripled by a jobber or independent who logically knows what titles will sell in that area. It's odd that other distributors did not initially ask for the 7 cent "stimulus" package or demand someone share in the scan based trading, however much a reality it is. Anco is a leaky garden hose and instead of fixing it with "common sense" merchandising, they expect publishers to just turn up the water while their sales continue to go down the drain due to poor management, bad decisions, useless programs and a total lack of business acumen. If Anco goes, good riddance.
Nothing New
Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 02/05/2009 - 14:40.

With 20 years executive experience on the wholesale side, this is not new news. These threats, discussions, negotiations have been going on between wholesalers and publishers for years, both publicly and in backrooms. Many of the decision making executives on both sides are a brick (magazine?)short of full load (bundle?)and do not encourage new thinkers/problem solvers in their businesses. It's still very much a good ole boy, who do know, what your last name is industry. These pissing matches will keep going on for the forseeable future, and the retailers just set back forcing higher discounts in their contracts, the wholesales will keep kissing their unreasonable butts, and try to make the publishers to keep paying the upcharge every contract period.
Verification...
Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 02/05/2009 - 16:25.

I work at a company in the distribution chain, and I can confirm that the Anderson/Source Interlink shutdown IS a reality. We are currently overloaded with now "homeless" freight, and it's making our job extremely difficult. Hudson and News Group are slowly beginning to pick up some of the slack, but nowhere near the amount of product that Anderson and Source were handling. I think it's going to be pretty crazy for at least a month or two, and warehouse space is starting to be eaten up by freight being held until a decision is reached. Lucky us!!!
Burn ANCO Down!!!!
Submitted by Fat Phil on Thu, 02/05/2009 - 17:28.

The magazine business is business model in the decline. Not since the mid 1990's have the wholesalers made profits. Companies like Anderson leverage their failing magazine business with profitable operations like cds, books, fireworks and etc. Rather than close the doors, incompetant CEO's like Charles Anderson continue to throw dollars into the fire. What's worse, Mr. Anderson is backed by top employees that fight by screaming ridiculous demands like this 7 cent hike. Maybe Mr. Anderson show actually run the company like a billionaire CEO he is and instead of haphazardly showing up after flying around the world with his hot wife, the company would not be trying to figure how to shut the doors quietly. By the way, look for an announcement on Friday for ANCO employees to be layed off. Thanks Charles, Frank, Bo for my wonderful 15 years delivering your crappy magazines in a box truck 6 years old with 9 year old tires.
@Verification..
Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 02/05/2009 - 18:13.

All you can confirm is that the distributor who prints and warehouses the magazines before being shipped to wholesaler locations is in fact withholding the magazines. This has already been confirmed and does not signal a shutdown, what this does signal is that you work with publishers and want to help spread the news. What everyone needs to do is sit back and realize how many jobs this effects. Everyone in this scenario is being stubborn.



RECENTLY in Audience Development dots icon
MOST READ on FOLIO: dots icon

FOLIO: Alerts & Newsletters dots icon

Sign up for our news alerts, special offers & feature updates:






CONNECT WITH FOLIO: NOW
   



Find What You Need dots icon

Folio: Marletplace

Seach top vendors, suppliers, service providers & more

Browse & Search the Full Directory Now



CAREER CENTER dots icon

Latest Featured Jobs