ADVERTISEMENT



At SNAP: ‘Print Will Be the New Vinyl’

A report from the annual association publishing conference.


By Vanessa Voltolina
06/04/2009

SEE ALSO: SNAP to Change Name

WASINGTON, D.C.—Some 250 association publishers have gathered here this week for the Society of National Association Publications’ annual conference. And while social media was clearly on the minds of many during the pre-conference workshop, the morning sessions today emphasized the advancement of print and digital editions.

According to Glenn Cook, American School Board Journal’s editor-in-chief, print will eventually become “the new vinyl.” Despite the evaporation of its paid circ model, which has cut into his publication’s market, “people still want long-form and crave the full body, tactile print experience,” Cook said.

While association publishers need to accept that print may evolve into a niche market, he said, it doesn’t mean they should stop producing print products. “They just need to be very targeted,” Cook said.

Cook later had a spirited debate with Smarter Media Sales president Josh Gordon about free versus paid content online. Gordon said publishers should “win the search engine war by aggregating content.” Cook recommended posting “a few paragraphs” for free online, then charge a fee for access to the entire story.

Tina Hay, editor of the Penn Stater, said association editors should assume readers are developing the same online reading habits for print. "Assume that when people pick up a magazine, they don't intend to read it," she said. "Good points of entry,” like short headlines, decks and captions, “turn skimmers into readers."

Live SNAP conference highlights can be found at live.snap09.com.

RELATED LINKS




Post Comment / Discuss This Story - Info/Rules

Print evolution
Submitted by Anthony on Thu, 06/04/2009 - 15:48.

Not sure what to make of this article. I feel that it is incomplete and mixes the issues at hand. Vinyl, as you know, is no longer around except in eccentric circles of dusty $5000 turntables so I'm not sure what that says about print. I believe people will always prefer the printed product over online until print products become impossible to print due to resources vs. cost. Then and only then, are Americans going to accept and warm up to reading long articles on their mobiles and online. It will also take a generational shift which is already occurring for that to actually happen. Like everything else, we went from vinyl to CDs, CDs to MP3 and so on. So will the evolution of media. As far as digital editions, well...I'm torn here. This is a technology that is playing middle man between print and online but serves neither. Who really believes that people really love to sit there and zoom in and zoom out and turn cumbersome digital pages with a mouse to read a magazine. You're kidding right? This technology will also find its way to the garbage pile once it develops into a real viable media technology. Pay for print is certainly coming back but only the most reputable and pertinent sites will get a piece of that pie. Hmmm...sounds like content all over again. So we're just talking about technology vs. content.
print to vinyl
Submitted by pubrat on Thu, 06/04/2009 - 16:44.

Um yeah, last time I checked I didn't see any LPs for sale at Wal Mart. Great analogy.
reading and listening are not the same
Submitted by Ann on Thu, 06/04/2009 - 19:59.

The media shift from vinyl LPs to tapes to CDs to downloads has been accepted more readily than the shift from print to digital media in part because listening to one form of recorded sound is not so different from listening to another form of recorded sound. Reading print and reading digital text are very different exercises, requiring eyes to do very different work under different conditions. And vinyl LPs are still available... there is a world beyond Wal-Mart (thank goodness).
It's the revenue, not the experience
Submitted by Congo on Fri, 06/05/2009 - 10:08.

All this fretting about the aesthetics of print vs. electronic reminds me of the day when many writers refused to use computers and submitted typewritten manuscripts. Where are those typewriter enthusiasts now? Print will probably live on as a high-end experience; almost all written media will go electronic. This is a problem not because of the aesthetics, but because so far, the revenues for electronic publishing have typically been just a fraction of those for print. The magazines I've worked on have struggled to get their electronic revenues to even 15 percent of their print revenues. That'll equalize as print withers, but it's not easy to produce a good website on 1/6th of the revenues it took to produce a good magazine. You save on printing and mailing, but not anywhere near enough to make up the difference.
Scares me
Submitted by Anonymous on Mon, 06/08/2009 - 10:23.

I like the feel of the comparison, but am scared by the economic reality it implies: In 2008: 1.88 million vinyl records were sold. 360.6 million CDs were sold (down from previous years). 65.8 MP3 downloads sold(up from previous years). Economic reality: vinyl is an obsure medium accounting for less than 1/2 of one percent of sales. Let us pray magazines do not meet a similar fate. Check the facts: http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&...



RECENTLY in Association and Non-Profit dots icon
MOST READ on FOLIO: dots icon

FOLIO: Alerts & Newsletters dots icon

Sign up for our news alerts, special offers & feature updates:






CONNECT WITH FOLIO: NOW
   



Find What You Need dots icon

Folio: Marletplace

Seach top vendors, suppliers, service providers & more

Browse & Search the Full Directory Now


FOLIO: mediaPRO dots icon

CAREER CENTER dots icon

Latest Featured Jobs