ADVERTISEMENT



What Went Wrong with the Postal Rate Hike?

Nothing, says Time Inc.’s mail czar.


Jim O By Jim O'Brien
03/12/2008 -14:19 PM






Recent data from the Postal Service indicate that Periodicals Class mail only covered 83% of its costs in fiscal year 2007. This news comes on the heels of the "cost based rates" that went into effect last July and were designed to reduce the Postal Service's costs. Many people in the industry are now wondering "What went wrong?" The answer is that "nothing went wrong," once three basic facts are understood:

  1. Since the new Periodicals Rates went into effect on July 15, 2007, the USPS' data only reflected 2-1/2 months of mailing under the new rate structure (the USPS fiscal year ended on September 30, 2007).
  2. In an effort to mitigate the impact on smaller mailers, the July, 2007 rates only reflected 40% of the actual bundle and container costs. As a result, mailers did not receive accurate pricing signals and some companies actually reduced the number of drop-ship entry points. This reduction resulted in increased USPS transportation costs.
  3. Many mailers focused 100% of their attention on implementing the new rate structure and spent very little time reviewing their mailing practices an implementing changes in 2007.

As a result of these three factors and others, the Postal Service did not reduce its costs in FY 2007. With this as a backdrop, the question now becomes, "Will the new rate structure have a positive impact on Postal Service costs in 2008?" To drive costs from the system, mailers need to make changes. Here are a few changes that are taking place at one mailer and in the printing industry.

Changes at Time Inc. 

Time Inc. is making a number of changes to its mailing behavior and these adjustments may be of use to other publishers. For starters, each title has been analyzed to determine if all or a portion of its circulation can take advantage of co-binding, co-mailing, and/or co-palletization. Today, six Time Inc. titles participate in co-mail pools and the company will soon begin to co-mail a portion of their large circulation monthly magazines. Most people think that large circulation titles are not good candidates for co-mail because they have little to gain in presort improvement, but that perception may soon change.

Todd Black, Time Inc.'s assistant director of postal operations, working in conjunction with Brown Printing and Time customer service, has developed an innovative plan for Essence magazine and other large circulation monthlies. It begins when Time customer service determines Essence's presort. The label data for the carrier route copies is sent to Brown Printing in its usual fashion and the copies are produced using selective binding. Following production, the carrier route copies are included in Fairrington Transportation's co-palletization pool and drop-shipped. Essence also has a number of copies that do not lend themselves to co-mailing (polywrapped, personalized wraps, etc.) and these copies are also included in the co-palletization/drop-ship pool. The balance of the non-carrier route labels are not presorted and customer service produces a SLIR file that is transmitted to Brown for inclusion in their co-mail pool. After manufacturing (using conventional binding) the copies are co-mailed, entered into the Fairrington pool-shipping program, and drop-shipped to 96 ADCs. As a result of this combination of co-mailing and co-palletization, virtually 100% of Essence is drop-shipped with very few sacks and a significant presort improvement.

Time Inc.'s weekly titles have also been reviewed and improvements have been made. Since these weekly magazines have large circulations and carrier route percentages in the 75% to 85% range, there is little opportunity for co-mailing and drop-ship improvement. However, certain editions of the magazines do quality for co-palletization. The best example of this is an edition of People magazine that is produced in one plant for a national distribution. Prior to the implementation of the new rate structure, this edition was placed in sacks and entered into the postal mail stream at the printing plant. Today, these copies are included in the Fairrington co-palletization pool and drop-shipped. As a result, these copies have shifted from "100% sacks and zero drop-shipping" to "nearly zero sacks and 100% drop-shipping."

Co-Binding 

In addition to the co-palletization, Time magazine co-binds its Life and Style supplement along with its regular issue four times per year. Entertainment Weekly will co-bind a special issue along with one of its regular issues in May.

When the changes have been completed on the Time Inc. magazines, Black estimates that 23 Time Inc. titles will be using co-mail or co-palletization for all or a portion of their print order. Black states that, "There are cost savings out there for everyone, regardless of your size or vendor. My advice to other mail owners is to dig deep into each mailing to find what portions you can better presort and drop ship right now. For the portions that can't, ask why and keep asking why until each mailing is optimized."

In addition to the changes being made by the Time Inc. titles, the printing/logistics industry is opening new co-mail facilities and adding new machines to handle a wide variety of products. Black recently visited the new R.R. Donnelley & Sons co-mail facility in York, Pennsylvania. In response to increases in customer demand, Donnelley already has expansion plans for this new facility. York complements Donnelley's existing facility in Bolingbrook, Illinois.

In March, Black will visit the ALG Worldwide Logistics facility also located in Bolingbrook. ALG is a logistics firm that provides co-mailing and drop shipping for the print industry.

Quad/Graphics has developed a multifaceted program that now includes: Multi-Mail (co-mail); Multi-Wrap (offline for poly wrapped Periodicals); Multi-Bind (co-binding); and Multi-Blend (inline combination of previously bound Periodicals with magazines that are being bound). These options provide a great deal of mail-piece design and production schedule flexibility for their clients while still creating volume that maximizes presort and drop ship efficiencies. Quebecor World Logistics continues to invest in solutions that will enable them to co-mail a greater range of product (specifically thin and poly wrapped mail pieces). By the end of 2008 they will double their capacity with new state of the art co-mailers.

Fry Communications in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania is now offering its customers onsite co-mailing, selective binding, blended mail at the mail table level, and co-production (co-binding). Fry reports that they are seeing substantial growth in the number of copies co-mailed and increasing interest from clients who previously were not interested in taking advantage of the reduced distribution costs. In addition, Fry now has customers who use them as a co-mailer but not as a printer. As Fry's pool size increases, the opportunity for savings increases as more copies move from a 3-digit sort level all the way to carrier route presort.

If the changes at Time Inc. and the printing/logistics industry are representative of more global Periodical Class change, we will most likely see a significant reduction in Postal Service costs and a corresponding improvement in cost coverage throughout 2008. Such changes will go a long way toward keeping Periodicals Class mail well within the CPI rate cap in future years.

[EDITOR'S NOTE: If your company has a co-mailing or co-palletization success story that you'd like to share, please send it to jim_obrien@timeinc.com.]





Jim O By Jim O'Brien -- Jim O'Brien is Time Inc.'s director of distribution and postal affairs.

Post Comment / Discuss This Blog - Info/Rules

What Went Wrong?
Submitted by Barbara Shepherd on Thu, 03/13/2008 - 16:39.

Forgive me, but "the July, 2007 rates only reflected 40% of the actual bundle and container costs" does indeed sound as if something went wrong, both systemwide (the "whether small mailers should continue to be subsidized by the USPS" issue) and tactically (communicating accurately to USPS customers).
What Went Wrong?
Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 03/14/2008 - 08:23.

20 layers of unneeded management is what wrong..... sad...
Apples and oranges
Submitted by Brian O'Leary on Fri, 03/14/2008 - 10:48.

The USPS model involves significant fixed costs that Time Inc. has successfully argued should be allocated based on cost of service. If Time Inc. really wants to keep the growth rate of the cost of periodicals mail within CPI, it needs to bring smaller publishers along. Unfortunately, most smaller publishers struggle to have production staff, let alone directors and assistant directors of distribution. The story told here is accurate, but it does not reflect the resource reality that smaller publishers face. These smaller publications also struggle to find ways to get to internet-savvy customers sooner, something co-mailing undermines. It may make the USPS more efficient, but co-mailing does not enhance the reader experience. I may be willing to wait another week or two for Time Life & Style, but I think the New Republic looks pretty tattered at that point. Postal distribution, like the newsstand conundrum, risks devolving into a battle of haves and have nots. The periodicals rate offered by the postal service was created in part to ensure distribution of a wide range of ideas and information. Efficiency is important, but if it comes at the price of content diversity, we've gone too far.
Headline: Dodge City elects Matt Dillon Sheriff!
Submitted by Bruce Woodward - Phoenix, AZ on Sat, 03/15/2008 - 12:42.

While, it’s hard to deny that the new Periodicals rates and processing hurdles are unfairly burdensome to the small publishers vs. large publishers, I would argue there is a larger, overarching flaw with the entire Periodical class; we simply don’t need it anymore. As Apples and Oranges reminds us in the above post, the 2C subsidized class was created 150 years or so years ago partially with the purpose of disseminating critical news and current events to areas to/from ‘outside the county.’ Although I wasn’t alive at the time, I can completely understand that back in the day, there was this need to inform the public. Fast forward to today’s 24/7 TV-instant Internet-wireless PDA-world. Isn’t it time to end this farce that we ‘need’ a Periodicals class for magazines and newspapers? With the today’s allowable ad/edit ratios, heck, are periodicals aren’t really about the news anymore. Moreover, we should also face up to the reality that integrity and objectivism in journalism is nearly dead; completely eroded by the demands for circulation and profit. We should finally and openly admit that the ‘news’ is actually the spun agenda of the publication’s ownership and blatant bias coverage of its largest advertisers. And not that that’s a bad thing. But come on people…can you explain to me what the newsworthy differences are between my local newspaper and the magazine my local hospital sends me? The USPS says the former (mailed 2C) purports to be news with some ads while the latter (mailed 3C) is deemed to be an ad with some news. On those days when I get a 5lb newspaper bundle, that health magazine seems the more credible news source. My feeling: we simply don’t need the Periodicals class. Period.
replay
Submitted by Visitor on Mon, 08/18/2008 - 07:35.

If they want the post office to make a profit, why not let Coca-Cola, McDonalds and Toyota put paid ads on stamps? Then make the paid ad stamps available to anyone for free or at a reduced rate after the post office covers it's costs plus a tiny profit.

RECENTLY in Design and Production dots icon

MOST READ on FOLIOdots icon

FOLIO: Alerts & Newslettersdots icon

Sign up for our news alerts, special offers & feature updates:



FOLIO: Alerts
Breaking news & industry updates

FOLIO: Publishing Technology
The Latest on Trends, Issues & Products (2x Monthly)

FOLIO: Special Promos
Special offers & announcements from Partners, Sponsors & Red 7 Media

FOLIO: Update
Webinar, content & service feature updates



CONNECT WITH FOLIO: NOW
   


CAREER CENTER dots icon

Latest Featured Jobs