ADVERTISEMENT



Unlocking the Digital Magazine Renaissance

A challenge to the industry: form an association for digital. Quick.


Josh Gordon By Josh Gordon
12/10/2008 -17:48 PM






I’ve heard it all over the magazine industry. As an ad revenue generator, digital magazines are a flop. “We tried doing a digital magazine,” one publisher told me, “but couldn’t sell any additional ad space. The clickthroughs were abysmal and after a few issues we stopped doing it.”

But digital magazines are a distribution success story. B-to-B publishers have deployed digital editions successfully to boost their BPA circulation cheaply, and consumer magazines are selling digital edition subscriptions. But these editions typically include only the ads sold into the print issues.

Many media buyers do not understand the value of digital magazines as an advertising medium. I believe this is because the basic research to measure the impact digital magazines have as a unique advertising medium has not been done.

Every advertising media has a trade advocacy group that does ongoing research to prove its value. For magazines, it’s the Magazine Publishers of America; for cable television, it’s the Cable Advertising Bureau; for billboards, it’s the Outdoor Advertising Association of America; for Web advertising. it’s the Interactive Advertising Bureau, etc.

No one advocates for digital magazines in this way, and yet, there are three big questions that need answering:

1. Do readers skip the ads?

The good news is that digital magazines are very interactive. The bad news is that digital magazines are very interactive. The questions is, how many readers go to the table of contents and jump to just the articles they want to read, skipping all the ads in between? Do some demographic groups skip more? What are the content strategies that editors can use to hold a readers interest though the entire issue? Do digital magazines need to be shorter or more focused than print magazines so readers don’t skip? Until the "skip factor" question is answered, media buyers will stay away.

2. Is the format a problem?

What if you took all of the articles in a digital magazine and reformatted them into a typical e-mail newsletter, initially just showing article headlines and the first few sentences to click on and read the whole article? This would be quicker and avoid the wait time while images download. What’s missing? The graphical formatting. In a very basic way, when you sell advertising into a digital edition you are selling the value of graphical and text formatting. How important it is this to readers? Does it get them more involved in content? Do they read articles—and ads—at a higher level or involvement? If they could get the same content in a quick e-mail newsletter would they prefer it? Again, this kind of understanding is needed to help digital magazine publishers design for maximum impact, and for media buyers to understand "what’s in it for me."       
 
3. Do digital ads have impact?

How does an ad in a digital magazine actually impact a reader’s mind, say, versus a banner ad, a print ad or a TV ad? There are expectations and a basic understanding of how these other advertising media work. The basic research has been done and the advocacy association for each can tell you how advertising with their media works as a branding tool, lead generation tool or a new product introduction tool.

Please, no more surveys documenting the rapid growth of digital magazines and how happy the readers are with them. This measures only the success of digital magazines as a distribution medium. If this is all we get, media buyers will continue to be unimpressed.

I strongly believe digital magazines have a life as an ad-supported medium. I predict that once the basic research is done there will be a flurry of new digital magazines launched, designed as original digital editions. Ad-supported digital magazines will look and feel very different than their print originated counterparts. There will an understanding as to which kind of content will thrive as a digital magazine vs. content better-delivered as a simple e-newsletter. There will be a renaissance in editorial content and graphical design development specific for ad supported digital magazines.

I challenge the digital magazine industry to from an association and do the research. I’d love to help do it.

RELATED LINKS





Josh Gordon By Josh Gordon -- Josh Gordon is president of Smarter Media Sales.com where he works with publishers to maximize their online and print revenue through training, consulting, and representation.

Post Comment / Discuss This Blog - Info/Rules

Who are the readers?
Submitted by Kat Tancock on Wed, 12/10/2008 - 22:20.

I would be very interested to see this data on how readers are happy about digital magazines. I have yet to hear of anyone who reads them, and I am not a fan of the format, but I would be happy to be proven wrong. Kat Tancock, magazinesonline.wordpress.com
Digital magazines
Submitted by Razvan on Thu, 12/11/2008 - 10:36.

Kat, we have developed a digital car magazine - www.motorplay.co.uk and we have very good feedback from our readers regarding the format, editorial, user experience. the main idea is to create content dedicated for online, not just put the print edition into digital.
Quality ADs Needed
Submitted by Fred on Thu, 12/11/2008 - 21:49.

All magazines in prints have ADs, so when ADs are delivered in digital magazines, shouldn't the effect the same as print magazines? I think it should. In fact, it brings in an additional level of interactivity, e.g. you can now access the website with just a click. So, you need the right platform for the digital magazines to deliver all these ADs. AD Delivery Example: http://tinyurl.com/59ekwv
dgiital magazines
Submitted by ken on Fri, 12/12/2008 - 08:33.

Our company is experimenting with these but the results are not promising. Less than 10% of recipients even open them. Advertisers aren't interested in spending extra for them. They are less readable than even Web pages or e-newsletters. Recipients don't go back to them to continue reading, as they do with print.
replies
Submitted by Kat Tancock on Sat, 12/13/2008 - 12:43.

Razvan, I completely agree with you, which is why I have a problem with the digital edition format - it's just not fun to read. Fred, no, because the experience is different for the reader - and, as Ken said, people just aren't reading them. Josh, I'd still like to hear about these surveys you mention that say readers are happy with digital editions. Who are these readers?
User's Experience on Digital Magazines
Submitted by Fred on Mon, 12/15/2008 - 02:17.

"Fred, no, because the experience is different for the reader" Hi Kat, Thanks for your comments, but whenever I introduced the magazines (e.g. http://tinyurl.com/59ekwv) to someone, they just love the contents, and asked to subscribe to mailing list. So, are you talking the targeting of right audience/readers for the delivery. Ken also brought up an interesting point, "Less than 10% of recipients even open them.", curious to know the post-mortem analysis on this, if any?
Digital Magazine studies
Submitted by Josh Gordon on Mon, 12/15/2008 - 13:10.

Kat, Here are two studies that show readers of digital magazines like reading them and are growing in numbers. First from Texterity/ BPA: http://jgordon5.typepad.com/blog/2007/09/selling-digital.html Second From Gilbane/ Nxtbooks: http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/NXTbook/2008_gilbanereport/#/16 Good studies that show that people who like reading digital magazines, like reading digital magazines, and that there are more of them every day. What these studies do not address is if digital magazines are effective ad vehicles. In print, if you could show steady circulation growth and reader involvement you have a good shot at selling ads. But things are different on the Web. Right now, the hottest potential ad vehicle is social media. Yet if you read the articles from Ad Age, Folio, and The Economist, you find that content publishers are challenged for find ways to make money doing this. Economist article: http://jgordon5.typepad.com/blog/2008/03/social-networki.html Josh
Digital Magazine Research and the concept of an "Association"
Submitted by Cimarron Buser (Texterity) on Tue, 12/16/2008 - 08:54.

Josh, With respect to the idea of an association, I have thought about this quite a bit. The history of the industry is unfortunately ridden with numerous "events" that are purported to be about the "industry" but are really thinly disguised sales venues. Industry "surveys" are also suspect, but Texterity has gone ahead and done our own (with certification from BPA) and partnered with major research companies. We're not shy about saying that the magazines are our partners, but we (and others who have used this) believe that it is quite valuable data. Finally, with respect to the Gilbane study, I initiated this work by approaching Gilbane and the other providers to participate as a way to have a neutral party aggregate data that was available from each vendor. It's not perfect, but it was a starting point that could ultimately lead to an association of sorts. ............................................................................. The following research is available: ............................................................................. (1) Profile of the Digital Magazine Reader. This is the Third Annual research of the digital magazine reader. The 2008 Digital Magazine Reader Survey is the largest body of research available for understanding the profile and the needs of the digital magazine reader. Magazine readers from more than 161 different publications representing 51 publishers participated, with 33,897 recipients completing the survey. Texterity sponsored this research with the results certified by BPA Worldwide. DIRECT URL: http://info.texterity.com/info/reader-research/ ............................................................................. (2) Digital Magazine and Newspaper Editions - Growth, Trends, and Best Practices. The study covers the market for digital editions of periodical publications, and features statistics that unify audited data from two sources (BPA and ABC) with data from unaudited publications. The research was conducted by Gilbane Research, with sponsorship from multiple vendors. DIRECT URL: http://info.texterity.com/info/2008GilbaneReport/

RECENTLY in emedia and Technology dots icon

MOST READ on FOLIOdots icon

FOLIO: Alerts & Newslettersdots icon

Sign up for our news alerts, special offers & feature updates:



FOLIO: Alerts
Breaking news & industry updates

FOLIO: Publishing Technology
The Latest on Trends, Issues & Products (2x Monthly)

FOLIO: Special Promos
Special offers & announcements from Partners, Sponsors & Red 7 Media

FOLIO: Update
Webinar, content & service feature updates



CAREER CENTER dots icon

Latest Featured Jobs