ADVERTISEMENT



Time Editor: Someday There Will Be People Who Don’t Know There’s a Print Version

Stengel: ‘We want people to be addicted to the magazine.’


By Bill Mickey
02/12/2008

Time magazine’s managing editor Richard Stengel opened the Direct Marketing Association’s 22nd annual Circulation Day event today in New York with a keynote that largely addressed the magazine’s relationship with the Web site. Recounting the last year and a half, Stengle noted the magazine’s redesign, ratebase reduction, the new publication date and the Web site’s expansion into a product that stands out as a separate, 24/7 news site.

Broadly, Stengel said the magazine needed to regain its status as a vital read, in a way that vaguely echoed the luxe leanings of other high-end publications. “We have to become a more premium product with beautiful paper and photography,” he said. “Each medium needs to do what it does best. A magazine should be something you’re addicted to.”

The Web site, too, had, to Stengel, become static. “We were a traditional magazine Web site. We decided we should be a 24/7 news Web site.”

While the two products should be complementary halves, Stengel added that they nevertheless offer two very different perspectives on world news—and lately have been downplaying the opportunities of driving the audience from one platform to the other. Focus groups revealed that readers didn’t necessarily appreciate the callouts in the magazine to go to the Web site to see more information on a particular story, he said. “Why are we doing that? It doesn’t make sense,” said Stengel. “They should be two separate audiences. Someday there will be people who don’t know there’s a print product.”

In 2007, the rate base reduction, a cover price increase and a redesign of the magazine contributed to the second most profitable year in the magazine’s history, said Stengel. “It was during a time that we thought was going to be a transition year.”

Raising the cover price by $1.00, Stengel said, increased newsstand profitability but also caused sales to contract “a little.” Indeed, according to the recently released Fas-Fax report, single copy sales for the second half of 2007 fell to 107,277 from 133,084 in the same period 2006—a 19.4 percent decrease.

Stengel said that print has largely ceded breaking news to online and, as a result, has become the more analytical of the two platforms. “There’s no news that breaks in print anymore,” he said. “Print takes the facts and adds insight. Online is for the ‘what’ and print is for the ‘why’. The magazine puts it in context and that’s why we see them as complementary brands.”




Post Comment / Discuss This Story - Info/Rules

time inc.
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 02/13/2008 - 15:13.

It has been stunning to watch John Huey railroad through massive changes at Time and other Time Inc. publications (Fortune, People, Sports Illustrated). Essentially, he has destroyed the enterprise -- trying to paint lipstick on a dying pig. Time has morphed into the Economist, People has morphed into Us, Fortune has morphed into Forbes, Sports Illustrated has morphed into.... And all this in the name of change and over the dead bodies of hundreds of fine journalists who have been axed to make room for the "new thinkers" such as former Wonkette Ana Marie Cox, who replaced one of the finest journalists at Time after the Libby mess. Sad, sad times. When will Huey and co. be gone??? Before it is too late.
the new media lineup
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 02/13/2008 - 19:42.

yes, yes. print is for wow, online is for whoa and mobile is for . . . would someone remind me what mobile is for?
Two different animals
Submitted by Media Bill on Fri, 02/15/2008 - 08:01.

There's no one answer how to differentiate print, web and mobile products. Beyond breaking news, leveraging online's capabilities to connect audiences to each other for ratings, local perspective,tagging and networking is a big part of the equation. That, and realizing that trying to create a fortress around content is antithetical to the linking nature of the web - and ultimately - doesn't work. It's not easy, but the rules are yet to be written.
Time Inc. - the transformation
Submitted by Henry Blaufox on Fri, 02/15/2008 - 09:44.

It is difficult for an established institution to transform the way it operates. The larger, more successful, and older it ism the harder that task becomes. Nearly all the international print brands are struggling to transform themselves from print to web .So it is with the venerable Time Inc. A new way of thinking requires the old hands to ask, "What would a man from Mars do if he came here, and intended to create an electronic, instant delivery product to challenge Time Magazine?" It requires a whole new perspective. So, here is hoping them all the success, now that at least one executive (Stengel) realizes that his online product has to be something totally different from just a magazine with a version of the print product in online form. I hope the senior management at Time Warner will give the publications enough time, people resources, and funds to experiment until they succeed. Time Inc. has a history of patience in developing brands. Online it is easier to try prototypes and make changes than in print; the cycle time is faster, the financial risk much more limited. Time Inc. has routinely been staffed by top notch people. They deserve a chance to change, and succeed.
There's no getting around it ...
Submitted by Dylan Stableford on Fri, 02/15/2008 - 22:09.

... newsweeklies are in major trouble, both in print and online. (See the latest newsstand data for Time -- not good news.) The reason: these magazines were originally intended to deliver a weekly summary of news. But the world changed. People need news -- even the "Why is this story important?" perspective on the news -- immediately. Instantly. And there are plenty of sites willing to deliver both that way. Even if Time.com can differentiate itself enough from its print version to deliver both the news *and* real-time analysis, it's going to be playing perpetual catch-up ... I mean, have you picked up a copy of U.S. News & World Report lately? It's thinner than Barack Obama ...
the Tree at Iwo Jima
Submitted by F William Powers on Sun, 04/27/2008 - 20:55.

I lost many friends at the Iwo Jima battle, as far as I am concerned I will never again buy or read Time You can take the tree, and stick it where the sun does not shine. FWP



RECENTLY in Consumer dots icon
MOST READ on FOLIO: dots icon

FOLIO: Alerts & Newsletters dots icon

Sign up for our news alerts, special offers & feature updates:






CONNECT WITH FOLIO: NOW
   


Find What You Need dots icon

Folio: Marletplace

Seach top vendors, suppliers, service providers & more

Browse & Search the Full Directory Now


FOLIO: mediaPRO dots icon

CAREER CENTER dots icon

Latest Featured Jobs