ADVERTISEMENT



Esquire’s Granger: Magazine Medium ‘So Compelling We All Should Do More with It’

Editor responds to news of flashing anniversary cover.


Jason Fell By Jason Fell
07/28/2008 -16:48 PM






Since the report last week about Esquire's flashy e-paper October anniversary cover—and our follow-up on the technology behind it—I've been hearing/reading a lot of negative opinions about it.

One Web site called it obnoxious. Rex Hammock said it was "the worst use of technology by a magazine." Fast Company, in a blog post, estimated that the manufacturing process increases the issue's carbon footprint by 16 percent over other typical print publications. But, if you ask Esquire editor-in-chief David Granger, the technology could help revolutionize the way we read magazines, beyond the printed page and online.

"When I talk to groups I sometimes speak about the days I had when I'd get the new issue of Esquire and go through it and think to myself, ‘Fuck, it's still a magazine,'" Granger said in a recent interview with FOLIO:. "What I mean is that the medium is so compelling that I and we should all be able to do more with it. The magazine experience is one of the last remaining opportunities to enter a hermetically-sealed world, an edited experience of our culture created by someone else. And, more importantly, it's an experience that encourages you to stay in it rather than constantly bounce in and out of it.

"We have an amazing medium, print, and if we can enhance the experience of it by putting new technology to use, then all the better," he said.

Bob Sacks, an industry consultant and frequent proponent of technology, says that Esquire's flashy cover may be a small step overall but offers a glimpse of what's to come in the next few years.

"It's not a representation of what e-paper was designed for, but doing the cover is the right thing to do," Sacks says. "It will be a demonstration of what it can be used for. In the near future we all will have flexible e-paper readers in our pocket and will be able to access all the magazine and books you want."

Right now, the technology is expensive and, if you believe Fast Company, not very green. Granger says that, with time, he hopes the technology will become cheaper. Maybe, after some refining, the application will become more realistic and environmentally-friendly, too.

RELATED LINKS





Jason Fell By Jason Fell --

Post Comment / Discuss This Blog - Info/Rules

A better way to celebrate Esquire's past and future
Submitted by Rex Hammock on Mon, 07/28/2008 - 18:06.

Not only did I call it the worst use of technology by a magazine, I said they should unplug it. ( http://www.rexblog.com/2008/07/22/17763 ) I hate to play armchair shrink, but Granger is clearly bored with his job and with his magazine. He's misguided if he thinks that changing the medium is the solution. Here's lesson #1 about media: If you add technology to a medium and you change it, it's a new medium. It's no longer a magazine. Don't get me wrong: I love new media. I evangelize new media. I was new media before there was such a word as new media. But what I've learned is this: Dive head into new media -- don't add some lipstick to a pig and expect it to be anything but a pig with lipstick on it. (Not to imply that magazines are pigs, but hey, I couldn't resist.) For the editor of Esquire to admit -- in public, no less -- that his solution for thinking his magazine is "only a magazine" is adding blinking words to the cover should be grounds for his transfer to another position at Hearst where he can get over his, er, boredom.
Carbon Footprint
Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 07/29/2008 - 11:56.

Why on Earth are we worried about the "carbon footprint" of this Esquire stunt. I'll start worrying about the "carbon footprint" of the magazine industry the day the Sierra Club stops sending out direct mail.
Even dwarfs started small
Submitted by Thad McIlroy on Tue, 07/29/2008 - 19:01.

I too covered the brouhaha on my blog (http://thefutureofpublishing.com/blog/2/07/esquire_magazine_takes_a_stab...). I noted some very negative comments on two blogs (not referenced above). Tongue is cheek I feigned shock that Gizmodo's blogger even used the "f" word! I'm with Bob Sacks on this one. Esquire's use of E-ink may not represent the most thrilling adventure in new technology ever undertaken by a mass-circulation magazine, but in the immortal words of Werner Herzog, even drawfs started small. These are challenging times for everyone in the publishing industry: let's award an "A" for effort.

RECENTLY in emedia and Technology dots icon

MOST READ on FOLIOdots icon

FOLIO: Alerts & Newslettersdots icon

Sign up for our news alerts, special offers & feature updates:



FOLIO: Alerts
Breaking news & industry updates

FOLIO: Publishing Technology
The Latest on Trends, Issues & Products (2x Monthly)

FOLIO: Special Promos
Special offers & announcements from Partners, Sponsors & Red 7 Media

FOLIO: Update
Webinar, content & service feature updates



CAREER CENTER dots icon

Latest Featured Jobs