ADVERTISEMENT



Condé Nast Eyes Eye-Tracking

Publisher to monitor effectiveness of ad campaigns; others wait on technology.


By Jason Fell
04/23/2008

When the thought of “eye tracking” comes to mind, one may invariably picture some amalgamation of popular sci-fi flicks—the Matrix, Minority Report, Total Recall—with test subjects wearing cumbersome, Robocop-style headgear to trace eye and head movement.

For magazine publishers, these images are edging closer to reality.

Today, the clunky headgear has been replaced by cameras that are built into computer monitors. By collecting and analyzing data like “first gaze” and a person’s vision path across a page or screen, publishers can use the information to help design covers, monitor the effectiveness of advertisements and help plan Web site redesigns—and they are beginning to do so. Condé Nast recently partnered with eye tracking service provider MediaAnalyzer to analyze the effectiveness of its clients’ ads, especially for its long-term advertisers.

According to Scott McDonald, Condé Nast’s senior vice president of marketing research, the partnership enables the company to offer “a unique value add to advertisers in our publications.” Using MediaAnalyzer’s methodology, he says, “helps our advertisers maximize their ROI and determine whether readers are engaged with their ads.”

MediaAnalyzer’s Web-based “AttentionTracking” technology tracks the path of eye movement while a print or online ad is being viewed. This, combined with a questionnaire, allows MediaAnalyzer to quantify the ads that leave the most lasting impressions. Or attempt to, anyway.

“In an increasingly competitive magazine market—with publishers fighting declining circulation numbers and a shift in ad dollars to other media—it is important that publishers continue to differentiate their products and offerings from the competition,” says Charles Boyar, MediaAnalyzer’s vice president of U.S. operations. “Research can help publishers create better-looking and more compelling magazines [and Web sites] and can aid them in helping their customers to create ad campaigns that will best address readers.”

Are Other Publishers Buying It?

Despite some of the stated benefits, magazine publishers so far have been slow to buy into eye tracking technology, even online. So far, Condé Nast is MediaAnalyzer’s only magazine client.

“Most of the eye tracking technology science is used for video and Web work,” says veteran magazine consultant Bob Sacks. “When we start to get into digital editions, then the science becomes more meaningful and important, e-paper, eye tracking technology and a Web connection changes everything.”

“When used appropriately, eye tracking studies have the most immediate impact for magazine publishers as they relate to Web sites," says Tim Kauffold, director of business development at Oneupweb, an integrated online marketing firm that provides eye tracking services. Kauffold says studies can cost as little as $4,000 or “well into six figures.” Oneupweb does not have any magazine clients.

“The demands for user attention online are huge, and it’s critical for sites to maximize all the opportunities they have to interact with their users,” says Kauffold. “Poor navigation, cluttered content, and unnecessary confusion can force users away. This is a huge loss for publishers, especially in the relationship with their advertisers.”

But as print magazines continue to see their business move online, Sacks says more publishers will start turning more to eye tracking services. “When we as publishers adapt to the next level of digital information distribution, and abandon a print-only mentality, we will have to use all the science and technology at our command,” says Sacks. “Our use of eye tracking technology will grow as we do.”

[IMAGE CREDIT: Wired image: Condé Nast 'Point of Passion' campaign; photo illustration: FOLIO:]

RELATED LINKS




Post Comment / Discuss This Story - Info/Rules

Eye-Tracking
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 04/23/2008 - 16:17.

It's one thing to track reader interactions with existing online and digital opportunities, but I'm afraid this might be taking our tracking technology a little too far. This could be a true infringement of reader rights??? How do you staff to analyze all of this information? Right now we have more information than we can possibly sort through or digest. I'm afraid many folks don't understand what we have provided to this point.
Eye tracking and media
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 04/23/2008 - 16:47.

Interesting article although Conde Nast is not the first to implement this technology. I'm not truly sure that we are but we worked with The Center for Media Design at Ball State University back in the 2005 and 2006 timeframe. They have a great set up and staff there and we found the information very useful. We used it to help us with our redesign of our website, technologyreview.com. Jim Coyle Chief Operating Officer Technology Review, Inc.
LATE ADOPTERS
Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 04/24/2008 - 09:17.

ACTUALLY, THIS TECHNOLOGY HAS BEEN AROUND SINCE THE 1950s. WE'VE LONG BEEN ABLE TO TRACK EYE MOVEMENTS TO SEE WHAT PEOPLE PRIORITIZE WHEN LOOKING AT A PAGE. EARLY EXPERIMENTS SHOWED IF YOU ASKED VIEWERS TO JUDGE SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS OF PEOPLE PICTURED, THEY LOOKED AT JEWELRY AND CLOTHING. IF YOU ASKED VIEWERS TO GUESS AT RELATIONSHIPS, THEY LOOKED AT WHERE EYES WERE LOOKING AND THE BODY LANGUAGE OF PEOPLE IN THE PHOTO. CONDE NAST MAY BE JUST TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THIS TECHNOLOGY NOW, BUT I'M NOT SURE ALL THE KUDOS ARE WARRANTED FOR BEING LATE ADOPTERS.
eye-tracking
Submitted by jag on Thu, 04/24/2008 - 12:21.

Famed newspaper designer Mario Garcia and the Poynter Institute's Sara Quinn, among others, recently finished EyeTrack07 -- http://eyetrack.poynter.org/ -- the latest research in tracking readers' eye movements in newspapers and on web sites. The first study was done in the early '90s, I believe. The technology certainly isn't new, but the idea of using it to test how readers view ads certainly sounds new to me.
It is true that the
Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 04/24/2008 - 14:25.

It is true that the technology is not new and also that it has been applied to a variety of settings, including online and offline publishers, search engine result pages, etc. Eye-tracking by itself, however, is not meaningful unless one compares different design options (or just different variables such as socioeconomic vs. interpersonal communication cues as someone suggested in a previous comment). We should be aware that eye movement is bound to respond to stimuli, so that a way a page is currently designed is going to greatly influence the way one is responding to it. We gazed at a page with a picture displayed on the top right differently from how we look at a page with a video in the middle. Color, multimedia, location, layout, shape, etc. are all going to impact the way we distribute our attention and consequently process information on a page.



RECENTLY in emedia and Technology dots icon
MOST READ on FOLIO: dots icon

FOLIO: Alerts & Newsletters dots icon

Sign up for our news alerts, special offers & feature updates:






CONNECT WITH FOLIO: NOW
   



Find What You Need dots icon

Folio: Marletplace

Seach top vendors, suppliers, service providers & more

Browse & Search the Full Directory Now



CAREER CENTER dots icon

Latest Featured Jobs