ADVERTISEMENT



Atlantic’s Britney Bombs at Newsstand

Now-infamous cover sells 24,000 single copies—half as many as usual.


Dylan Stableford By Dylan Stableford
06/13/2008 -10:13 AM






Back in April, when the 150-year-old Atlantic plopped Britney Spears on its cover, it faced a backlash—albeit an expected one—from subscribers, bloggers and assorted media critics, some of whom criticized the magazine for "selling-out," pandering to capture a slice of what Portfolio dubbed "The Britney Economy."

Turns out the magazine wasn't selling out at all. The Britney cover tanked, according to figures submitted by the Atlantic to the Audit Bureau of Circulations Rapid Report filing system late last month. The magazine sold approximately 24,000 copies at the newsstand, some 21,000 less than March and nearly 30,000 less than its January/February issue. The magazine sold 40,900 single copies of its April 2007 issue, per ABC. (During the second half of 2007, each Atlantic issue sold, on average, 57,000 single copies at the newsstand.)

ATLANTIC'S 2008 NEWSSTAND PERFORMANCE

MONTH SINGLE COPY SALES COVER STORY
Jan./Feb. 53,300 "After Iraq"
March 45,000 "Which Religion Will Win?"
April 24,000 "The Britney Show"
May 40,000 "Is Israel Finished?"


Atlantic Media president Justin Smith told me in a recent video interview that the company was, in fact, expecting it to bomb:

"The irony is, we were doing this at our own peril, because most of our newsstand executives and circulation executives were saying ‘Don't put Britney on the cover! It's going to bomb on the newsstand!' So we put Britney on the cover despite some of our newsstand advisors."

"And sure enough to our predictions," Smith is quoted in FOLIO:'s June cover story, "it bombed on the newsstand."

Click here to see the full video. And click here to see "Atlantic Rising," our cover story on the Atlantic.

Luckily for us, there's no chance of it bombing.

RELATED LINKS





Dylan Stableford By Dylan Stableford --

Post Comment / Discuss This Blog - Info/Rules

Wow.
Submitted by Trade Pressed on Sat, 06/14/2008 - 17:52.

Well, that's refreshing. But isn't the Atlantic the one that put, "Is Google Making Us Stoopid?" on its cover? I think that whole idea is uncool.
But did you read it?
Submitted by Anonymous on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 17:07.

The Britney cover might have tanked, but it's disappointing that this news-byte doesn't include any sort of background on the article - I'd be hard-pressed to believe that Atlantic has its sights set on the celeb news market, so what'd the article have to say? Similarly, for the "Is Google Making Us Stoopid?" article, at face value seems to be a criticism on the Google empire, but having read the article on their website, I thought it was very well-written and well-researched regarding the evolution of human thought processes.
Doesn't Matter WHAT the Article Says
Submitted by Peter Tucker on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 14:42.

I can't believe anyone would defend the "totally-off-the-mark" cover by saying "read the article". The cover is the beginning of the article! Many didn't read the story precisely because the cover was so appalling. Our beloved Atlantic is in a downward spiral and has lost its visual compass.
Not much of a surprise
Submitted by AE on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 11:57.

For one, the photograph just wasn't that engaging. If they were trying to sex things up with Britney, they choose a crappy photo. Worse, instead of giving readers a good sense of what the article's take on its subject was, it simply parroted the magazines that the article described. The article was not about Britney, it was about the changes in the paparazzi industry that have happened of late. Namely that instead of having a relatively limited of highly skilled photographers, the industry has shifted to simply hiring hordes of relatively unskilled freelancers to stalk celebrities everywhere they go. It also got into how celeb photos got too expensive be exclusive, so most photographs go in all the magazines. If they were bound and determined to make this a cover story, a better picture would have showed the craze of the paparazzi, preferably with a recognizable celeb in the background. I find it odd that Smith admitted that he expected newsstand sales to tank. Honestly, the story was an ok read, but I just don't see any justification for taking such a hit. Sure, take a hit to get an idea out there that you think is underplayed, but important. Doing to describe the paparazzi industry? Who really cares?
Thanks for listening
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 12:28.

Just another example of a corporate upper executive ignoring the marketing experts in circulation and single copy sales, who now, no doubt, are being told to "be creative" and cover the shortfall to budget.
Canceled subscription after Britney
Submitted by Carl Hart on Fri, 06/20/2008 - 20:33.

I subscribed to Atlantic last spring, and the first issue that arrived was the Britney Spears issue. It bored, annoyed and turned me off so that I never paid for the subscription and canceled it instead.

RECENTLY in Audience Development dots icon

MOST READ on FOLIOdots icon

FOLIO: Alerts & Newslettersdots icon

Sign up for our news alerts, special offers & feature updates:



FOLIO: Alerts
Breaking news & industry updates

FOLIO: Publishing Technology
The Latest on Trends, Issues & Products (2x Monthly)

FOLIO: Special Promos
Special offers & announcements from Partners, Sponsors & Red 7 Media

FOLIO: Update
Webinar, content & service feature updates



CAREER CENTER dots icon

Latest Featured Jobs