Ozzie Profile: People.com
To the casual observer, Peopleâ€”a weekly magazine in the ultra-competitive, cluttered, often frantic 24-hour celebrity news categoryâ€”has in recent years ceded space to popular celebrity bloggers and round-the-clock Web sites like TMZ (like People, owned by Time Warner), Perez Hilton and Defamer.com.
Lots of Competition
But People.com competes in an even broader category, says Fran Hauser, People.com general manager. â€śWe compete with any site that has female readers,â€ť says Hauser. â€śEighty-seven percent of our visitors are female. That means we compete with sites like iVillage and Glam.com as well as the blogs.â€ť
Such competition makes its Web real estate, People.com, critical to the magazineâ€™s success. As such, the magazine has been gradually redesigning its site over the last nine monthsâ€”increasing itâ€™s size by 35 percentâ€”and leveraging what its bloggy competitors donâ€™t always have: access. Along with a dedicated video channel, the magazine launched regular behind-the-scenes franchises online such as its Style Watch channel, red carpet coverage and something called Celebrity Central, an online database that churns out mini-sites for the top 100 celebrities the magazine covers.
All of which adds up to consistent traffic growth (7.4 million unique visitors in September, up from 6.7 million in August, according to comScore Media Metrix) and engagementâ€”24 minutes per visitor per month, Hauser says.
Up next for People.com: an archive. The magazine is taking all of its contentâ€”30 years, some 40,000 pages and 1,600-plus coversâ€”and putting it online. â€śIt will give our readers a much deeper experience,â€ť says Hauser. And, like Timeâ€™s much-celebrated archive, which debuted in 2005 with great fanfare, People.comâ€™s archive will be ad-supported and free.
Judges Comments: â€śIt kept me reading about Angelina and thatâ€™s what this magazine is all about.â€ť
Post Comment / Discuss This Story - Info/Rulesblog comments powered by Disqus